TECHSHIN
Map
AI Governance, Enablement & Measurement — For CEOs & Boards

Govern your AI. Prove it to your board. Satisfy your regulator.

Most organisations are already running AI tools their governance teams have not approved — and the EU AI Act, ISO 42001, and board accountability requirements are not waiting. MAP gives your leadership team a single, authoritative view of every AI system in your organisation: what it is, who approved it, what it costs, and whether it is under control.

No infrastructure. No IT project. Your first map can be live the same week.

Inventory & Control

Your first authoritative answer to the board's AI question

The org chart, agent register, and tool register together replace the spreadsheet nobody trusts. When someone asks "what AI do we actually have, and who approved it?" — this is where the answer lives.

🗺️
Organisational Source of Truth
The foundation that makes every governance question answerable. Without knowing who does what and where, you cannot know which AI is operating in which part of your organisation — or whether it has been sanctioned.
  • Authorised changes only — lock any map so only the owner or org admin can modify it
  • Exportable to PDF for board presentations, with org name, map name, and date
🤖
AI Agent Register & Decisions Log
What AI is actually running in this organisation right now? Which agents are supervised, and which are operating autonomously? If a high-risk system made or influenced a decision last week, is there a record?
The Agent Register is a complete, cross-organisation inventory of every AI agent deployed — with its governance status and how human oversight is applied before its outputs result in action. EU AI Act Article 14 requires documented human oversight controls for high-risk AI systems. The register is where you maintain and evidence those controls.
The Decisions Register is where every AI-influenced decision in your organisation is logged — its status (pending, approved, or rejected) and the oversight trail that demonstrates your controls are working.
  • Complete agent inventory across every part of your organisation
  • Governance status and human-oversight classification per agent
  • Decisions Register: pending, approved, and rejected AI-influenced decisions, with full audit trail
  • Export a complete agent inventory — ready for audit handoff or external review
🛠️
Tool Register: Know Every AI Tool You're Paying For
Most organisations cannot name every AI tool they are paying for. The Tool Register changes that.
Know which tools are active, which are being trialled without board sanction, and which have already been reviewed and rejected. Every tool carries a documented governance decision — not a status field, a record.
When your CFO asks what AI is actually costing the organisation, the answer is here — spend attributable by person, not pooled in a budget line where shadow AI hides.
  • Active / experimental / rejected — documented governance decisions, not descriptions
  • Spend attributable by person — monthly totals and a per-person report, ready before your CFO asks
  • One tool list shared across your whole organisation — no duplicate entries, no version drift
🔄
Workflow Documentation
When an incident occurs and the regulator asks what controls were in place — what the AI was doing, in what sequence, and who authorised it — the answer cannot be a conversation with whoever was in the room.
Document the AI-embedded processes your teams actually run. EU AI Act Article 9 requires risk management procedures for high-risk AI systems — which means documented controls at the process level, not only at the system level. When the question comes, you produce a timestamped record. You do not reconstruct from memory.
  • Process-level audit trail — tools, sequence, and authorisation on record before an incident occurs
  • Accountability traceable from workflow to agent to the person who authorised deployment
Export a complete AI inventory — ready to hand to an auditor, import into a risk management framework, or pass to an external reviewer.
Strategy & Delivery

The only place where AI strategy and AI delivery live in the same tool

AI use cases and the people who own them live in the same platform as the org chart that shows where they land. When a use case moves from backlog to delivery, accountability is already established. Board stakeholders see exactly what is in flight — without a slide deck and without a login.

🎯
Use Case Registry
A prioritised, board-presentable backlog of where AI can be deployed — linked to the actual person, role, or task it affects. When a use case is approved, accountability is structural, not assumed.
Each use case carries a documented deployment mode — autonomous, assisted, or human-supervised — so the classification is on record before the system goes live. That classification matters when a regulator asks whether human oversight was required and whether it was in place.
Most AI deployments have no documented basis for deciding whether to continue or stop. MAP records that decision before deployment, not after an incident. Each use case carries a documented measurement standard: continue, double down, or stop. That is a governance decision. It is traceable, and it is on record.
  • Linked to person, role, or task — accountability is structural, not assumed
  • Documented deployment mode recorded before the system goes live
  • Measurement criteria: continue / double down / stop — the governance decision on record before deployment
  • SOP linked directly to the use case it governs
  • Delivery sequence maintained and visible to every stakeholder
🏃
Sprint Board: Governed Delivery Visibility
Most AI programmes handle board reporting with a slide deck emailed to twelve people and updated by whoever remembered. This replaces that — with a live, access-controlled view your board can check any time, without chasing an update.
Named, expiring share links give any external stakeholder — board member, auditor, consulting partner — a read-only view of exactly the sprint delivery plan you choose to share. Nothing else in your organisation is exposed. Access expires automatically. Revoke it the instant it is no longer needed.
AI Framing Sprint
Most teams arrive at MAP with their AI inventory already built — because the Sprint built it. The AI Framing Sprint is a structured two-day engagement that produces the agent register, use case backlog, and organisational AI picture that populate MAP from day one. It is how most governance programmes begin.
Document Vault

Your policy library and compliance calendar, in one place

Missed review deadlines. Out-of-date policies presented to auditors. No version trail when someone asks what the policy said six months ago. MAP's Document Vault replaces that exposure: living policy documents, version history, review deadlines, and overdue alerts — with 30 curated AI governance templates so your team is not writing from scratch when the audit deadline arrives.

  • 30 curated AI governance templates — covering ISO 42001, NIST AI RMF, EU AI Act, and OECD Principles
  • Review dates and overdue alerts — policy currency tracked automatically, no manual chasing
  • Overdue policy count visible at a glance, org-wide
  • Full version history — every policy change timestamped, so you can show what your policy said on any given date
SOP Register

Org-wide SOP compliance tracking

When your regulator or auditor asks to see your AI operating procedures, this is what you show them. A single view across every part of your organisation — every SOP obligation, every status — assembled and waiting, not pulled together the morning the auditor arrives.

📋

When the audit arrives, you are not assembling evidence. You are presenting it.

  • SOP status per use case: present / required-missing / not-required
  • Required SOPs flagged with due date — you know before the auditor asks
  • Overdue SOPs flagged automatically across every part of your organisation
  • A single cross-organisation view of every obligation and every status
Reporting & Visibility

The numbers leadership needs. The access controls governance requires.

📊
Board Reporting
AI Coverage % is drawn directly from the organisational chart — the proportion of tasks with a deployed AI agent, live and accurate, not assembled the night before a board meeting. Alongside it: decisions pending human approval, overdue policy documents, and exactly what your AI portfolio is costing, by person, by month. Updated continuously. Ready the moment you need it.
  • AI Coverage % — your single boardroom KPI for AI deployment progress, tracked org-wide
  • Active decisions pending human approval — know before your auditor asks
  • Overdue policy documents — know before your regulator does
  • Per-person spend report — what your AI portfolio costs, by person, by month
🕸️
Network Visualiser
The org chart shows hierarchy. The Visualiser shows relationships. An interactive force-directed graph connecting every person, tool, workflow, agent, and task in your organisation — so you can see concentrations of AI activity, single points of tool dependency, and coverage gaps that a table or chart cannot reveal.
When a regulator asks whether AI deployment is disproportionately concentrated in one part of the organisation, or whether a single tool failure would cascade across multiple critical processes — the Visualiser is the answer.
  • Interactive graph — zoom, filter by node type (people, tools, workflows, agents, tasks)
  • Click any person to navigate directly to their chart panel and full agent list
  • Identify concentration risk and dependency chains invisible in list views
  • Syncs live with your org chart — always current, no manual refresh
🔗
Governed Access
You decide who sees what, and for how long. Board members, auditors, and external partners get exactly the view they need — no login, no edit access, no permanent footprint.
Share links for the org chart and sprint delivery plans are named, expiring, and revocable. You decide who received access, what they could see, and when it expires — and you can revoke it the moment it is no longer needed. This is a governance control, not a convenience feature.
  • Expiring, revocable read-only links for the org chart and sprint boards
  • Revoke any link instantly from a single management view
  • Share only the sprint that is relevant — nothing else is exposed

Your regulator won't wait for your spreadsheet to catch up.

Boards are already asking questions governance teams cannot answer. The EU AI Act is in force. ISO 42001 audits are underway. Most teams run the AI Framing Sprint first — it produces the AI inventory, agent register, and use case backlog that live inside MAP from day one. Before you can govern AI, you need to understand what you are actually dealing with. The Sprint is where that starts.

Sign in to MAP AI Framing Sprint →